Kalshi argues that geography doesn’t matter in the IGRA case

Green phone on the map with question mark

Kalshi, the main prediction market in North America, argues that the location of the bets placed does not contradict the regulatory law of Indian games (IGRA).

The results supplier has participated in the battles of the Court with the Blue Lake Ranchería, Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians and the Rancheria de Rancheria chicken of the Me-Wuk Indians (the California tribes) since July 2025.

Kalshi is in a heated debate with the California tribes

We reported that the tribes had been in a prolonged legal debate with Kalshi, and the Ho Chunk nation has been vocal in its mockery of the betting operator.

Saying: “While disguising novel products and futures products, these event contracts are substantially, nothing more than illegal and unregulated bets on the results of sporting events.”

Kalshi states that the company’s association with the coacked Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Robinhood Derivos LLC (Robinhood) do not constitute a violation of the IGRA and has invoked a part of the Law of Control of Games Illeles of Internet (Uigea) to support its position that is not a concern about bets in its application.

Critics have seen that the part of the Uiega is used as a weak defense, but Kalshi falls under a specific branch of the Public Exchange Law (CEA).

This means that the argument of betting suppliers can exempt them, such as the bet, specifically called “bet or bet” through Kalshi, is related to “any transaction made or subject to the rules of a registered entity or the exempt trade board under the CEA.”

The Legal Lohaol gives Kalshi a splinter of hope

“Kalshi does not host servers in Indian lands. Kalshi does not use personnel in Indian lands. Kalshi does not do any business in Indian lands,” said the company based in New York.

This could mean that Kalshi is exempt as an exchange that falls under the CEA; However, critics point out that these possible technical and legal lagoons related to the company are outdated, and that bets can be placed in tribal lands through the Robinhood application, which would constitute a violation of the GAME.

Kalshi also argued that he would suffer irreparable financial damage as a result of the court order presented by the California tribes in the United States District Court for the California district.

The prediction provider stated that it would have to stop operating to regulate the location of the bets placed to align the locations of the tribal lands.

Whatever the result, the hearing on the possible judicial order on October 23, 2025 will be a matter of marquee and could lead to serious legal disputes about tribal relations and the future of the IGRA.

Outstanding image: Canva

The Kalshi publication argues that geography does not matter in the IGRA case appeared first in Readwrite.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *