Useful information

Prime News delivers timely, accurate news and insights on global events, politics, business, and technology

I took your opinions “Superman is irrelevant” and I took them out

By Drew Dietsch | Published

I have already angered a facet of the anti-fabricaSuperman speech. Since the world continues to become more and more angry, I thought it would be good to channel that anger to tear down another equally ridiculous mentality opponents of James Gunn’s film, the idea that Superman as a character/concept has become irrelevant.

To what I say, once again you are showing your butt. You don’t know anything about heroes, storytelling, popular culture or human psychology.

The gods of history

There is an infinite number of stories and types of stories, but my personal belief with the narration of stories is that there are two gods of history. These are the primary narrative needs that have promoted human perception and social evolution for the entire sensitivity: the history of the hero and the history of terror.

These are the two stories templates that we, as humans, need to meet. That is why we have religious mythology to this day. The power of these two types of stories will always be relevant and necessary to feed collective consciousness.

Only at that elementary level alone, Superman is a permanently relevant idea and it is worth using to explore our relationship with Hero’s story. These types of characters and stories have persisted throughout history in any number of cultures. While there have been people elaborating stories in Cuevas, we have required a heroic fantasy narrative with iconic models of models that embody our hopes and aspirations.

Honestly, that should be the end of the conversation. But, so that I can say that I covered a large amount of land, we will pierce Superman’s specificity and why it is still relevant almost a century after its creation.

Superman is American mythology

While I will not enter into a complete biography of the creators of Superman, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, I will highlight that both were children of Jewish immigrants and their inheritance is inextricable to Kal-el’s character, a name that is based on the Hebrew language. Just listen Ordinance The legendary story of producer Michael Uslan about the recipination of the history of Moses with the history of Superman.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c274u-edzo

Kal-El is a foreigner, a literal foreigner, who enters the country illegally. It is protected and raised by two of the Heartland farmers in the United States, the Kent, and grows believing in the best people of all cultures and creeds. He has its purpose in the life of protecting those who cannot protect themselves.

This is the story that Americans tell about our own national mythology. While I am not saying that I reflect the truth about the United States, it is the story we want and need to believe: the United States as a force of good that came from another place, realized its incredible power and used that power to help the world instead of hurting it.

No matter what cynical or fascist covered in the flag could say, this idea that absolute power is handled with absolute goodness should be the fundamental narrative to which Americans strive us. It is the history of the hero of the promise of our country. If that is not eternally relevant, then we are no longer telling a hero story about the United States. We are feeding the history of terror.

And if you are still convinced that Superman is irrelevant after that, let’s spend time shooting some expected, boring and brain francs on that forehead.

“Superman is irrelevant!”

“Superman is an outdated version of the superhero. Just because he is the original superhero, that does not make it special. In fact, that makes it boring. His powers are stupid. They give their powers to the characters all the time because they are very basic. It is very basic.”

I refer you to the concept of the archetype and why it is so valuable and versatile in the course of the relationship of human history with the narration of stories. The state of Superman as an original superhero does not make it obsolete as a character. In fact, it is fascinating to see how many different iterations of Superman have existed in incalculable media types. His state in popular culture has never disappeared, and its influence on the fundamental aspects of the superhero template only creates more reasons to examine it continuously through its own stories.

“Superman doesn’t work in today’s hardest world. People will not believe in a character that comes from a simpler moment.”

Superman reached the shelves a year before World War II and found his popularity in the midst of the most devastating conflict in the known history of our planet. If that is the world in which Superman was born and succeeded, then as a symbol of hope and goodness, then it is when the world is at its hardest point that people need a simple and identifiable hero to admire.

“… superhero fatigue.”

If you are tired of superhero stories, good! Stop putting superhero stories in front of your eyes. While talking, the history of the hero will always be relevant to collective consciousness. Even if superhero cinema fluctuates in general popularity, superhero stories are here to stay and have been since the dawn of the stories.

It is possible that Superman does not continue to work in the cinema depending on the stories told with his character and world, but there is no way that people stop wanting Superman stories.

Siegel and Shuster took the nihilistic übermensch of Friedrich Nietzsche and reformed him in the maximum symbol of empathy and justice. Thanks to that, a hero who fights for truth, justice and what should be the American form will remain relevant as long as we want to believe.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *