California legislators once again challenge Newsom’s technological ties with AI Bill

Last year, California Gavin Newsom governor vetoed to Very popular (between the public) and wildly controversial (Among technology companies) bill that would have established solid security guidelines for the development and operation of artificial intelligence models. Now you will have a second chance, this time with at least part of the technology industry that gives it green light. On Saturday, California legislators approved Project 53 of the Senate, a historical legislation that would require that the companies undergo new security evidence.

Senate bill 53That now he hopes that the governor’s signature will become law in the State, would require companies that build “border” models, systems that require massive amounts of data and computer energy to operate, to provide more transparency in their processes. That would include revealing security incidents that involve dangerous or misleading behavior due to autonomous systems, providing more clarity about safety protocols and risk assessments, and providing protections for complainants who are concerned about the possible damage that can come from the models in which they are working.

The bill, which would apply to the work of companies such as Openai, Google, XAI, Anthrope and others, has certainly been opposed by the previous attempts to establish a wide security framework for the AI ​​industry. The bill that Newsom verted last year, for example, would have established a “mandatory” switch “for the models to address their potential that become dishonest. That is not found here. An earlier version of SB 53 also applied safety requirements to smaller companies, but that has changed. In the version approved by the Senate and the Assembly, companies that bring less than $ 500 million in annual revenues only have to reveal high -level security details instead of more granular information, For the politician—A change made in part at the request of the technological industry.

If that is enough to satisfy Newsom (or more specifically, satisfy the technological companies that would like to continue receiving campaign contributions) It has not yet been seen. Anthrope recently softened legislation, opting for He launches his support behind him Just a few days before it would officially pass. But commercial groups such as Consumer Technology Association (Cta) and Chamber for ProgressThey have among their member companies such as Amazon, Google and Meta, have come out in opposition to the bill. OpenAi too He pointed out his opposition to the regulations that California has been chasing without specifically naming SB 53.

After the Trump administration tried and could not implement a 10 -year moratorium in states that implement regulations on AI, California has the opportunity to lead the issue, which makes sense, given most companies at the forefront of space are operating within their borders. But that fact also seems to be part of the reason Newsom is very shy to squeeze the trigger on regulations despite All his bravery on many other issues. Their political ambitions require money to run, and those Companies have a lot to offer.