Useful information
Prime News delivers timely, accurate news and insights on global events, politics, business, and technology
The perplexity, the starting building backed by the company, the AI search building, has been sued in a federal court for allegedly violating the registered trademark of another company.
In Complaint filed on Thursday In the US District Court for the Northern District of California, lawyers representing a company called perplexity resolved solutions accuse the perplexity of violating their brand rights by using the “perplexity” brand.
Solutions resolved from Perplexity, a plane -based company, Texas, founded in 2017, applied to register The registered trademark with the United States Patent and Brands Office (USPTO) in October 2021, according to the complaint.
PERPLEXITY SOLVED SOLUTIONS MAINLY SELLING SOFTWARE OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND WORK PLACE, INCLUDED A UNIFIED BOARD FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYSIS AND A VIDEQUE CONFERENCER CALLED PERPLEXITY MEET. The company secured a registered trademark for November 2022 and began promoting products on its site, Perplexityonline.com, a domain that perplexity solutions resolved had been recorded in 2021.
The perplexity and lawyer of the solutions resolved by perplexity did not respond to the time of publication. Techcrunch will update the article if any part comments.
The Texas company alleges that the perplexity of the startup of AI began to violate its registered trademark “in or around” in August 2022 to promote its search engine with AI. The previous month, July 2022, perplexity had registered the perplexity of the domain.
“The website (perplexity) currently located in the name of the offender domain presents perplexity (registered trademark),” says the complaint, “(y) the offending goods and services are very similar to those offered by perplexity (resolved solutions ) and attracts a similar customer base. and other organizations. “
Perplexity spaces, that the startup of AI based in San Francisco released for business clients In October, they are centers with a customizable AI assistant and connectors to third -party platforms, applications and file systems.
The complaint claims that perplexity has “saturated the market” with its offender brand, including commercialization in its various social media accounts. The AI startup refused to buy the registered brand of perplexity in September 2023 when it is offered, according to the complaint, and instead chose to request its own registered trademark with the USPTO, which is still pending.
According to the complaint, the perplexity did not comply with a letter of cessation and withdrawal of the perplexity lawyer Solved Solutions, and has not withdrawn his registered trademark application, despite the efforts to oppose the application before the Joint and Appeal Board of the USPT.
The lawyers for perplexity resolved solutions say that the use of their perplexity brand of their brand sow confusion.
“In fact, after information and belief, consumers have already been confused,” reads the complaint. “For example, on numerous occasions, users of social networks have” labeled “perplexity in their publications about the defendant’s offender.”
The complaint claims that Perplexity’s conduct violates the laws, including Lanham’s law, the Federal Law of the United States that regulates registered trademarks and unfair competition. Among other forms of legal relief, perplexity resolved solutions is to prevent the perplexity of the use of its registered trademark, as well as the registered trademark “AI perplexity”, damages and the transferred property of any domain that includes the perplexity mark.
It is the last headache of the court for perplexity, which is currently fighting a lawsuit filed by Dow Jones of News Corp and the NY Post about what the plaintiffs describe as a “content kleptocracy.” Many other news sites have Express concern That perplexity closely replicates its content, only last October, the New York Times sent The startup a card of cessation and withdrawal.
